Case Summary: What Happened?

The quick facts about Steven Paul Colón's case

Why This Case Matters

  • Stand Your Ground Law Misuse: This case demonstrates how self-defense laws can be manipulated when law enforcement fails to properly investigate and apply legal standards.
  • Sheriff Accountability: The SCSO's refusal to charge despite overwhelming evidence raises serious questions about investigative integrity and selective enforcement of the law.
  • Community Safety: When aggressors can claim self-defense without consequence, it undermines public safety and erodes trust in our justice system.

On September 24, 2022, Steven Paul Colón was shot and killed by David Ross Gregory in Osprey, Florida. The evidence demonstrates this was not a justified homicide, but rather a case of premeditated murder that warrants immediate prosecution.

Key Facts

Gregory was the aggressor

Both David Gregory and his wife Amy admitted in testimony that David crossed over to Steven's side of the road. This admission establishes Gregory as the aggressor, fundamentally disqualifying any self-defense claim under Florida's Stand Your Ground law.

Selective Enforcement and Concealed Carry Violation

The Sarasota County Sheriff's Office (SCSO) was fully aware that David Ross Gregory did not possess a valid concealed carry permit at the time of the September 24, 2022 shooting. Under Florida law at that time, this constituted a third-degree felony, as a concealed carry permit was required to lawfully possess and carry a firearm in public.

During his own recorded interview with SCSO investigators, Gregory admitted that he did not have a valid permit, a fact the agency verified through state records. Despite this clear admission of a felony weapons offense, the SCSO willfully refused to charge Gregory, thereby engaging in selective application of the law. This deliberate inaction reflects an effort to shield Gregory from prosecution and to conceal the unlawful nature of his firearm possession, which directly impacts his eligibility for Stand Your Ground immunity.

By failing to act, the SCSO knowingly allowed the statute of limitations to expire on this felony offense during the past year, effectively ensuring that Gregory would avoid prosecution. However, this failure does not foreclose accountability. The State Attorney retains the authority to file an Information charging Gregory with this offense, or alternatively, to convene a grand jury to return an indictment.

Under Florida Statute §776.012(1), individuals engaged in unlawful activity are explicitly disqualified from Stand Your Ground protection. Gregory's unlawful possession of a concealed firearm therefore negates any immunity claim and underscores the fundamental injustice in SCSO's decision to disregard this offense.

Contradictory evidence

The forensic evidence directly contradicts Gregory's account of a close-range struggle. Multiple witnesses heard two gunshots, not one, suggesting excessive force. The investigation was procedurally flawed, biased, and failed to collect or preserve critical evidence.

Forensic Evidence – Proves Shot from Distance and Place Gregory on Steven Paul's side of the road

The Medical Examiner's forensic findings establish that the fatal shot was fired from a distance of approximately 5–6 feet. Gunshot residue (GSR) results further corroborate this conclusion, confirming proximity consistent with the Medical Examiner's analysis. Forensics also place David Ross Gregory on Steven Paul Colón's side of the road at the time of the shooting.

Despite the clarity of these forensic findings, the Sarasota County Sheriff's Office (SCSO) continues to rely on false narratives, unfounded rumors, and discredited assumptions to justify their refusal to charge Gregory. These conclusions are factually unsupported and scientifically contradicted.

It is now incumbent upon the State Attorney's Office (SAO) to correct this grave miscarriage of justice, to rely on verified forensic and medical evidence rather than conjecture, and to remove this decision from the hands of those who have repeatedly demonstrated investigative incompetence and bias.

The evidence in this case is overwhelming and unambiguous. David Ross Gregory murdered Steven Paul Colón in cold blood, executing a plan he had articulated to multiple witnesses over the preceding weeks. His claim of self-defense is a transparent fabrication, systematically dismantled by forensic science, neutral eyewitness testimony, and his own contradictory statements.

This was not self-defense. This was murder.

The State has:

  • Forensic proof that the shooting occurred from a distance with no physical struggle
  • Eyewitness testimony that the victim was fleeing while the shooter was enraged
  • Prior threats establishing premeditated intent
  • Admissions by the defendant that he was the initial aggressor
  • Evidence of illegal arming in anticipation of violence
  • Proof of consciousness of guilt through fabricated narratives and delay

Respectfully, the State Attorney has the necessary elements to authorize the filing of charges for First-Degree Premeditated Murder against David Ross Gregory and vigorously oppose any claim of Stand Your Ground immunity.

Justice for Steven Paul Colón demands nothing less.